Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3347516
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T01:25:51+00:00 2026-05-18T01:25:51+00:00

I’m new to web security. Why would I want to use HTTP and then

  • 0

I’m new to web security.

Why would I want to use HTTP and then switch to HTTPS for some connections?

Why not stick with HTTPS all the way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T01:25:52+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 1:25 am

    There are interesting configuration improvements that can make SSL/TLS less expensive, as described in this document (apparently based on work from a team from Google: Adam Langley, Nagendra Modadugu and Wan-Teh Chang): http://www.imperialviolet.org/2010/06/25/overclocking-ssl.html

    If there’s one point that we want to
    communicate to the world, it’s that
    SSL/TLS is not computationally
    expensive any more. Ten years ago it
    might have been true, but it’s just
    not the case any more. You too can
    afford to enable HTTPS for your users.

    In January this year (2010), Gmail
    switched to using HTTPS for everything
    by default. Previously it had been
    introduced as an option, but now all
    of our users use HTTPS to secure their
    email between their browsers and
    Google, all the time. In order to do
    this we had to deploy no additional
    machines and no special hardware. On
    our production frontend machines,
    SSL/TLS accounts for less than 1% of
    the CPU load, less than 10KB of memory
    per connection and less than 2% of
    network overhead. Many people believe
    that SSL takes a lot of CPU time and
    we hope the above numbers (public for
    the first time) will help to dispel
    that.

    If you stop reading now you only need
    to remember one thing: SSL/TLS is not
    computationally expensive any more.

    One false sense of security when using HTTPS only for login pages is that you leave the door open to session hijacking (admittedly, it’s better than sending the username/password in clear anyway); this has recently made easier to do (or more popular) using Firesheep for example (although the problem itself has been there for much longer).

    Another problem that can slow down HTTPS is the fact that some browsers might not cache the content they retrieve over HTTPS, so they would have to download them again (e.g. background images for the sites you visit frequently).

    This being said, if you don’t need the transport security (preventing attackers for seeing or altering the data that’s exchanged, either way), plain HTTP is fine.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.