Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5841191
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T11:51:28+00:00 2026-05-22T11:51:28+00:00

I’m not 100% sure I’m doing this right, but I think I’ve found an

  • 0

I’m not 100% sure I’m doing this right, but I think I’ve found an issue where auth.Permission objects aren’t being created soon enough for migrations to use them when you initialize a DB from scratch.

The important details:

  • I’m trying to initialize a Django DB from scratch using ./manage.py syncdb --migrate --noinput

  • I have 11 migrations in my chain

  • The 1st migration creates a new model called myapp.CompanyAccount

  • The 9th migration tries to fetch the permission myapp.change_companyaccount with:

p = orm[ "auth.Permission" ].objects.get( codename = "change_companyaccount" )

At that point, an exception is raised:

django.contrib.auth.models.DoesNotExist: Permission matching query does not exist

I had assumed that the default permissions that are defined for every object (as per http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/auth/#default-permissions) would have been created by the time the 1st migration finished, but it doesn’t appear that they are. If I re-run the migration after the exception, it works the second time because apparently the permission now exists and the 9th migration can execute without error.

Is there anything that can be done to “flush” everything sometime before the 9th migration runs so that the whole thing can run in a single pass without bailing out?

Thanks for any help / advice.

EDIT: In response to John’s comment below, I found out that the following command-line sequence will work:

  1. ./manage.py syncdb (this initializes the default Django tables)
  2. ./manage.py migrate myapp 0001 (this causes the CompanyAccount table to be created)
  3. ./manage.py migrate myapp (this migrates all the way to the end without error)

Unfortunately, skipping step #2 above means that you get the same exception in the 0009 migration, which tells me that my original suspicion was correct that default permissions on new models are not created by South immediately, and are somehow only pushed into the database when the entire migration chain finishes.

This is better than where I was (I’m at least avoiding exceptions now) but I still need to manually segment the migration around the creation of new models that latter migrations might need to touch the permissions of, so this isn’t a complete solution.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T11:51:29+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 11:51 am

    As it turns out, the answer is to manually call db.send_pending_create_signals() at some point before you try to access the default permission since South only does this “flushing” step quite late in the process. Thanks to Andrew Godwin from South for replying to this on the South mailing list here:

    http://groups.google.com/group/south-users/browse_thread/thread/1de2219fe4f35959

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I'm looking for suggestions for debugging... If you view this site in Firefox or
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is
In order to apply a triggered animation to all ToolTip s in my app,
I have a JSP page retrieving data and when single or double quotes are

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.