Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 908353
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T16:42:18+00:00 2026-05-15T16:42:18+00:00

I’m not a Javascript person normally, but I’ve been diving in, reading Douglas Crockford’s

  • 0

I’m not a Javascript person normally, but I’ve been diving in, reading Douglas Crockford’s book, and writing some trivial, useful tidbits as Chrome extensions and Node.js (note that this question isn’t about either of them).

Right now, I’m trying to figure out how to retain a reference to an object that’s initiating an AJAX request, that is: once I set the onload event handler (this is from inside a Chrome extension, so I’m using the base XMLHttpRequest object), is there any way that I can refer back to MyObject in the following example:

MyObject.prototype = {
    PerformAction: function() {
        this.Request = new XMLHttpRequest();
        this.Request.open("GET", this.ConstructUrl(), true);
        // From within ActionResultHandler, 'this' will always be the XMLHttpRequest
        this.Request.onload = this.ActionResultHandler,
        this.Request.send(null);
    }
}

Doing this exactly is going to assign this to be the request object itself, and if I simply introduce a wrapper:

this.Request.onload = function() { ActionResultHandler() };

well, that just isn’t going to do anything, because the ActionResultHandler is now out of scope. The reason I’m asking here is because I’ve only found trivial cases of caller manipulation (e.g. manipulating what this refers to from inside a function), but given that OO-ified Javascript and AJAX are literally everywhere, this has to have to be a known, simple issue, but my Google-fu is failing me here. In C#, events are invoked in the context of whoever attaches to them, not the object firing the event, so this doesn’t come up on a daily basis. Perhaps there’s a much better JS pattern that avoids this issue entirely?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T16:42:19+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:42 pm

    It’s not really clear to me which variable you want to hold a reference to. Here’s how you would retain a reference to MyObject in your onload handler:

    MyObject.prototype = {
        PerformAction: function() {
            var MyObjectRef = MyObject,
                ActionResultHandler = this.ActionResultHandler;
    
            this.Request = new XMLHttpRequest();
            this.Request.open("GET", this.ConstructUrl(), true);
            // From within ActionResultHandler, 'this' will always be the XMLHttpRequest
            this.Request.onload = function () {
                    ActionResultHandler.apply(MyObjectRef, arguments);
                };
            this.Request.send(null);
        }
    }
    

    Edited

    Ok, I reread your question again and it seems that you want to execute ActionResultHandler in the context of MyObject, so I tweaked my code to do this.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I'm looking for suggestions for debugging... If you view this site in Firefox or
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is
In order to apply a triggered animation to all ToolTip s in my app,
I have a JSP page retrieving data and when single or double quotes are

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.