Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1020591
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T11:11:08+00:00 2026-05-16T11:11:08+00:00

I’m not sure I really understand dependency management. Does it mean you’re only not

  • 0

I’m not sure I really understand dependency management. Does it mean you’re only not dependent on the details of another class? It doesn’t mean have anything to do with the call itself correct? I keep hearing to make smaller more specific class but they can’t depend on each other and this doesn’t seem possible to me. Can someone try to simply explain this to me. I put some examples below.

//Bad Dependency
public class TestOne
{
     TestTwo testTwo;
     public void TestOneMethod()
     {
          testTwo = new TestTwo();
          testTwo.SomeProperty = "Value";
          testTwo.SomeMethodThatWorksWithSomeProperty();
     }
}
//Bad dependency??
public class TestOne
{
     TestTwo testTwo;
     public void TestOneMethod()
     {
          int myInt = 0;
          TestThree testThree = new TestThree();
          //... Some Code that works with testThree

          testTwo = new TestTwo();
          myInt = testTwo.GetSomeInteger(testThree);
     }
}

There can be only set of settings per run, so why would I want to keep hitting the database everytime a new class is called?? Is this a bad dependency


public static class Application
{
    public static int SomeSetting = 0;
    public static GetSettingsFromDatabase()
    {
        //loads the settings for this store
        DatabaseClass dbClass = DatabaseClassDataSource.LoadForStore();
        SomeSetting = dbClass.SomeSetting;
    }
}

public class MyClass
{
    public void MethodOne()
    {
        if(Application.SomeSetting == 1) { //... }
    }
}

public class MyClassTwo
{
    public void MethodOne()
    {
        if(Application.SomeSetting == 1) { //... }
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T11:11:09+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 11:11 am

    Certainly if you’re using resource-intensive actions like calling a database, you can probably justify breaking a design pattern for the sake of performance. That said, I’m not certain this is always a bad practice – I’m pretty sure there are examples in the .NET framework (among others, I’d bet) that are pretty tightly coupled, though I doubt you’ll see a lot of that exposed to the public. If you do break a design pattern, though, you may want to document what’s going on and why, especially if someone else will ever look at or maintain this code, and internalize as much as you can.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.