Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I’m not sure if I’m interpreting the javadoc right. When using a ReentrantLock after calling the lock method and successfully gaining a lock, can you just access any object without any synchronized blocks and the happend-before relationship is magically enforced?
I don’t see any connection between the ReentrantLock and the objects I’m working on, that’s why it is hard to believe I can work on them safely. But this is the case, or am I reading the javadoc wrong?
If thread A has modified some object inside a code block CB1 guarded by the lock and then releases the lock, and thread B enters in a code block guarded by the same lock, then thread B will see the modifications done by thread A in the code block CB1.
If two threads read and write the same shared state, then every read and write to this state should be guarded by the same lock.