Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I’m not sure this is possible but I’m trying to declare an Object that will act as a Class, Method or Field (mainly just to call getAnnotation()).
I thought of trying Object<? extends AnnotatedElement> as they all share that implementation but Object is not a generic type.
Is this possible and if not what would be a better approach (besides separate objects for each)?
Just declare as AnnotatedElement.