Home/ Questions/Q 724697
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-14T06:15:09+00:00

I’m parsing various site feeds, and putting together a small library to help me

  • 0

I’m parsing various site feeds, and putting together a small library to help me do it.

Looking at the Atom RFC and RSS 2.0 specification, feeds from Twitter seem to be a combination. Twitter specifies an Atom namespace in an RSS 2.0 structure?

GitHub uses Atom, whereas Flickr (offers multiple but the default ‘Latest’ feed from user profiles) appears to be RSS 2.0.

How can Twitter specify a Atom namespace and then use RSS?

This makes parsing feeds a little ambiguous, unless I ignore any specified namespace and just examine the document structure.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Twitter does not actually specify the namespace for RSS at all, but it’s actually RSS. It specifies the namespace for Atom only because it uses some atom elements internally (specifically it uses an atom:link to refer back to the URL of the feed.

    Notice that the xmlns for atom has a prefix specified, which means that only those elements with the atom: prefix in the document are from that namespace.

    The simplest method for disambiguating practically is to just look at the root element. If it’s Atom, it’ll be feed. If it’s RSS, it’ll be rss.

    • 0