Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I’m performing this on a string:
var poo = poo
.replace(/[%][<]/g, "'<")
.replace(/[>][%]/g, ">'")
.replace(/[%]\s*[+]/g, "'+")
.replace(/[+]\s*[%]/g, "+'");
Given the similar if these statements, can these regexs be comebined somehow?
No, I don’t think so. At least, I suspect for any transformation involving fewer replaces I can come up with a string that your original and the proposed alternative treat differently. However, it may be that the text you’re working with wouldn’t trigger the differences, and so for practical purposes a shorter transformation would work as well. Depends on the text.