Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8989027
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T22:09:08+00:00 2026-06-15T22:09:08+00:00

I’m porting some OpenMP parallelized loops to GCD for use on iOS. I’ve encountered

  • 0

I’m porting some OpenMP parallelized loops to GCD for use on iOS. I’ve encountered a construct that I’m not sure how best to model.

The OpenMP loop does some nontrivial operations on a shared state block, of which it allocates one per possible OpenMP thread, and then combines (reduces, in effect) the results after the loop. Like this (simplified):

const int max_threads = omp_get_max_threads();
state_block state[max_threads];

#pragma omp parallel for shared(state) 
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < some_count; i++) {
    // do some stuff
    update_state(state[omp_get_thread_num()]);
}

merge_state_data(state, max_threads);

GCD doesn’t offer a way to know what the max number of possible threads are (does it?) or which one you’re currently on, so this pattern doesn’t work. The state block is nontrivial in size, and the iteration count is large, so allocating one for every iteration of the loop as a pure worst case isn’t plausible either.

It’s conceivable that I could use a custom dispatch source with DISPATCH_SOURCE_TYPE_DATA_ADD to do the state update, but there would be thousands of sources required if I atomized it like that, and that seems wrong.

Is there something I’m missing, either with GCD or generally in the design here?

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T22:09:09+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 10:09 pm

    You can use the POSIX threads API functions pthread_setspecific() and pthread_getspecific() on iOS to set a thread-specific key, that points to a temporary state_block and to retrieve it later in the currently executing block. Apple’s Concurrency Programming Guide does not recommend using pthread_getspecific() as it might return different values in different block runs but in your case this is perfectly acceptable (after all, that’s the functionality that you are seeking).

    As you do not have prior access to the pool, you have to assign the state blocks on demand:

    • use pthread_getspecific() to get the state_block pointer in the current thread;
    • if no specific value was set, then allocate a new state_block and assign it to the value of the key using pthread_setspecific();
    • compute using that state_block.

    This might create problems with cleaning things up, for example think on how to dispose the state blocks once all tasks have been executed. You might want to use a shared table of pointers and set a unique index in the table as the thread-specific value or something similar. You might use locks to serialise the access to the index value – this is acceptable as it would only be done once per each thread in the pool.

    Of course, this approach relies on GCD using a fixed thread pool to implement its concurrent queues.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
I'm not entirely sure how I managed to jack this up. http://pretty-senshi.com If you
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have a small JavaScript validation script that validates inputs based on Regex. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.