Home/ Questions/Q 1056775
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-16T17:45:53+00:00

I’m preparing some educational/training material with respect to Unit Testing, and want to double

  • 0

I’m preparing some educational/training material with respect to Unit Testing, and want to double check some vocabulary.

In an example I’m using the developer has tested a Facade for all possible inputs but hasn’t tested the more granular units ‘behind’ it.

Would one still say that the tests have “full coverage” – given they cover the entire range of inputs? I feel like “full coverage” is generally used to denote coverage of code/units… but there would certainly be full something when testing all possible inputs.

What’s the other word I’m looking for?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    If all possible inputs don’t give you 100% code coverage, you have 100% scenario coverage, but not complete code coverage.

    On that note, if you have 100% scenario coverage without full code coverage, you have dead code and you should think real hard about why it exists.

    • 0