Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8837953
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T09:51:47+00:00 2026-06-14T09:51:47+00:00

I’m programming in JavaScript and I would like to know if there is a

  • 0

I’m programming in JavaScript and I would like to know if there is a ‘best’ method of creating multiple image objects. Take the code below as an example.

var a = new Image();
var b = new Image();
var c = new Image();

Is this the only way to do it, or should I do something like…

var a = new Image(), b = a, c = a;

I’m just wondering if there is a different way of doing the first method. I find my program contains a lot more ‘new Image()‘ variables, and I thought being repetitive was bad for the code.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T09:51:49+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 9:51 am

    I would probably build them as an array, rather than pollute your namespace with a pile of separate variables pointing to different Image objects.

    var imgs = [];
    var numImgs = 10;
    // In a loop, build up an array of Image objs
    for (var i=0; i<numImgs; i++) {
      imgs.push(new Image());
      // Initialize properties here if necessary
      imgs[i].src = 'http://example.com';
    }
    // imgs now holds ten Image objects...
    // Access them via their [n] index
    img[3].src = 'http://stackoverflow.com';
    

    This isn’t going to be much more or less efficient than creating multiple variables, but it is certainly easier to keep them organized. You will save a few lines of code in initializing them, but in the long run, that amounts to a micro-optimization which will have only negligible effect.

    Note that if you really want a text descriptor for each Image, you could opt to use an object {} instead of an Array [] and set its properties to small descriptive strings. You could even initialize it via an array:

    var imgNames = ['stackoverflow','google','example'];
    var imgs = {}
    // Initialize object properties in a loop
    for (var i=0; i<imgNames; i++) {
      // Initialize a property in the object from the current array value using [] notation
      imgs[imgNames[i]] = new Image();
    }
    // Then you can access them by their property name:
    imgs.google.src = 'http://www.google.com';
    imgs.stackoverflow.src = 'http://stackoverflow.com';
    

    This borders a little on misuse of the object to behave like a PHP or Perl associative array, but will provide easy access to the images if you need them by name rather than a numeric key as in the array method above.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I am trying to render a haml file in a javascript response like so:
I would like to run a str_replace or preg_replace which looks for certain words
I would like to count the length of a string with PHP. The string
I know there's a lot of other questions out there that deal with this
I would like my Web page http://www.gmarks.org/math_in_e-mail.txt on my Apache 2.2.14 server to display
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I used javascript for loading a picture on my website depending on which small
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.