Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 717689
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T05:26:29+00:00 2026-05-14T05:26:29+00:00

I’m refactoring a library we currently use, and I’m faced with the following problem.

  • 0

I’m refactoring a library we currently use, and I’m faced with the following problem.

We used to have the following stuff :

class Blah
{
    float[][] data;
    public float[] GetDataReference(int index)
    {
        return data[index];
    }
}

For various reasons, I have replaced this jagged array version with a 1 dimensionnal array version, concatenating inner arrays.
My question is : how can I still return a reference to a sub array of data ?

class Blah
{
    float[] data;
    int rows;

    public float[] GetDataReference(int index)
    {
        // Return a reference data from offset i to offset j;
    }
}

I was thinking that unsafe and pointers stuff may be of use, is it doable ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T05:26:30+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 5:26 am

    No, you can’t do this – but you should look at using ArraySegment instead.

    Note that an array object consists of metadata about its length etc and then the data itself. You can’t create a slice of an existing array and still have the metadata next to the data, if you see what I mean – there’d have to be an extra level of indirection (which is what ArraySegment provides).

    (I’m slightly surprised that ArraySegment doesn’t do more wrapping, e.g. by implementing IList<T>, but there we go. It would be easy enough to create such a structure if you wanted to.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.