Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 620123
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T18:43:46+00:00 2026-05-13T18:43:46+00:00

I’m relatively new to SQL and I’m not sure how to do a one

  • 0

I’m relatively new to SQL and I’m not sure how to do a one to one relationship. Having read about the first 3 forms of normalization, I’m currently under the impression that the best way to do this would be to have an intermediary table, ala-3rd from many to many relationships, except each column being declared unique.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T18:43:46+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:43 pm
    ImageDetails
    ------------
    id (PK)
    name
    description
    
    
    ImageData
    ------------
    id (PK & FK)
    blobfield
    

    Something like this might be a good reason/way to do a one-to-one relationship but normally you would just have all your data in one table where each row is what defines the relationship.

    One reason for separating them might be to limit access to a specific table for a user while allowing access to other data for that key field.

    Another possible reason for having a separate table for a one-to-one relationship is when you do not wish to have null in your column. For instance, if 90% of the data will be null, you may be better off with a completely separate (and smaller) table and joining that field on the PK instead. This is actually considered to be an “optional one-to-one relationship” because you do not truly have one record for every possible relationship.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.