Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 244687
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T21:01:32+00:00 2026-05-11T21:01:32+00:00

i’m running into a strange problem in Microsoft SQL Server 2008. I have a

  • 0

i’m running into a strange problem in Microsoft SQL Server 2008.
I have a large database (20 GB) with about 10 tables and i’m attempting to make a point regarding how to correctly create indexes.

Here’s my problem: on some nested queries i’m getting faster results without using indexes! It’s close (one or two seconds), but in some cases using no indexes at all seems to make these queries run faster… I’m running a Checkpoiunt and a DBCC dropcleanbuffers to reset the caches before running the scripts, so I’m kinda lost.

What could be causing this?
I know for a fact that the indexes are poorly constructed (think one index per relevant field), the whole point is to prove the importance of constructing them correctly, but it should never be slower than having no indexes at all, right?

EDIT: here’s one of the guilty queries:

SET STATISTICS TIME ON
SET STATISTICS IO ON

USE DBX;
GO
CHECKPOINT;
GO
DBCC DROPCLEANBUFFERS;
GO
DBCC FREEPROCCACHE;
GO

SELECT * FROM Identifier where CarId in (SELECT CarID from Car where ManufactId = 14) and DataTypeId = 1

Identifier table:
– IdentifierId int not null
– CarId int not null
– DataTypeId int not null
– Alias nvarchar(300)

Car table:
– CarId int not null
– ManufactId int not null
– (several fields followed, all nvarchar(100)

Each of these bullet points has an index, along with some indexes that simultaneously store two of them at a time (e.g. CarId and DataTypeId).

Finally, The identifier table has over million entries, while the Car table has two or three million

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T21:01:32+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:01 pm

    My guess would be that SQL Server is incorrectly deciding to use an index, which is then forcing a bookmark lookup*. Usually when this happens (the incorrect use of an index) it’s because the statistics on the table are incorrect.

    This can especially happen if you’ve just loaded large amounts of data into one or more of the tables. Or, it could be that SQL Server is just screwing up. It’s pretty rare that this happens (I can count on one hand the times I’ve had to force index use over a 15 year career with SQL Server), but the optimizer is not perfect.

    * A bookmark lookup is when SQL Server finds a row that it needs on an index, but then has to go to the actual data pages to retrieve additional columns that are not in the index. If your result set returns a lot of rows this can be costly and clustered index scans can result in better performance.

    One way to get rid of bookmark lookups is to use covering indexes – an index which has the filtering columns first, but then also includes any other columns which you would need in the “covered” query. For example:

    SELECT
         my_string1,
         my_string2
    FROM
         My_Table
    WHERE
         my_date > '2000-01-01'
    

    covering index would be (my_date, my_string1, my_string2)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 147k
  • Answers 147k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can @Ignore in front of the test method. It… May 12, 2026 at 9:15 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You have to: Go to the Design view Click on… May 12, 2026 at 9:15 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Dennis Troller answered it to the question that Ben linked… May 12, 2026 at 9:15 am

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.