Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8483825
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T20:12:45+00:00 2026-06-10T20:12:45+00:00

I’m seeing that more developers are now using $(‘#element-id’).on() method instead of $(‘#element-id’).live() method.

  • 0

I’m seeing that more developers are now using $('#element-id').on() method instead of $('#element-id').live() method.

Why? What is has that live method doesn’t have?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T20:12:47+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 8:12 pm

    Event handlers bound with .live are bound to the document. Event handlers bound with .on are bound to an element you specify. That means you can reduce the amount of time taken for the event to bubble up to the element that will receive it, and it also means you can stop the propagation (not possible with .live since it’s already reached the document).

    The .on method also allows you to use a single method for all event handlers – .live will always delegate the event handler, whereas .on will only delegate if you pass a selector as the 2nd argument. Without one, it will bind to the matched set of elements.

    More drawbacks are listed in the jQuery docs:

    • jQuery attempts to retrieve the elements specified by the selector
      before calling the .live() method, which may be time-consuming on
      large documents.

    • Chaining methods is not supported. For example,
      $("a").find(".offsite, .external").live( ... ); is not valid and does
      not work as expected.

    • Since all .live() events are attached at the
      document element, events take the longest and slowest possible path
      before they are handled.

    • On mobile iOS (iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch) the click event does not bubble to the document body for most elements and cannot be used with .live()…

    • Calling event.stopPropagation() in the event handler is ineffective in stopping event handlers attached lower in the document; the event has already propagated to document.

    • The .live() method interacts with other event methods in ways that can be surprising, e.g., $(document).unbind("click") removes all click handlers attached by any call to .live()!

    For all of these reasons, you should always use .on() instead of .live(). If you’re stuck on an old version of jQuery (below 1.7), you can use .delegate() instead.


    Side note – all event binding methods call .on() under the hood, so it makes sense to use .on() for all your event handling needs. Don’t bother with the shortcut methods like .click(); you can see from the 1.7.2 source that all they do is call .on:

    return arguments.length > 0 ? this.on(name, null, data, fn) : this.trigger(name);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
In my XML file chapters tag has more chapter tag.i need to display chapters
I have thousands of HTML files to process using Groovy/Java and I need to
I have an array which has BIG numbers and small numbers in it. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.