Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9301899
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T23:08:04+00:00 2026-06-18T23:08:04+00:00

I’m sending data to a server via JavaScript for a REST API (this will

  • 0

I’m sending data to a server via JavaScript for a REST API (this will be inside a PhoneGap app hence using jQuery rather than any server code). I’m building my own API so I have flexible options, but I wonder if there is a preferred way to handle POST data. I use JSON for the GETs, so should I be using it for the POSTs?

What is the better way to send it?

1) Using the serialize method and then sending it as data, e.g.:

$('form').submit(function(e){

    e.preventDefault();

    var form = $(this);

    $.ajax({
        type: 'POST',
        url: form.attr('action'),
        data: form.serialize(),
        success: function(response){
            // handle response
        },
        error: function(a,b,c) {
            // handle error
        }   
    });

});

or 2) sending it as a JSON object like:

$.fn.serializeObject = function()
{
    var o = {};
    var a = this.serializeArray();
    $.each(a, function() {
        if (o[this.name] !== undefined) {
            if (!o[this.name].push) {
                o[this.name] = [o[this.name]];
            }
            o[this.name].push(this.value || '');
        } else {
            o[this.name] = this.value || '';
        }
    });
    return o;
};

$('form').submit(function(e){

    e.preventDefault();

    var form = $(this);

    $.ajax({
        type: 'POST',
        url: form.attr('action'),
        data: JSON.stringify(form.serializeObject()),
        success: function(response){
            // handle response
        },
        error: function(a,b,c) {
            // handle error
        }   
    });

});
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T23:08:05+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 11:08 pm

    In your question you don’t specify what you mean by “better way,” so perhaps you should edit your question to clarify that. For example, are you specifically concerned with performance, memory usage, etc.?

    However, in a very general sense I would say the better way to do this type of thing is to go with the approach that you find easier to read, because that’s the approach that will be easier to debug, extend, and modify over the course of time. Looking only at the client side code, your first approach appears to be easier to read, but if you are responsible for the server side, you should consider that too. Go with the approach that you think will be easier to maintain overall.

    Finally, you don’t indicate in your question whether you are going to publish the REST API for others to use, but if you are, then the most important factor is actually how easy it is to read and understand the API. By that measure, you should probably use JSON in both your GETs and POSTs.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I am using Paperclip to handle profile photo uploads in my app. They upload
I'm making a simple page using Google Maps API 3. My first. One marker
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I am using jsonparser to parse data and images obtained from json response. When
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I am using JSon response to parse title,date content and thumbnail images and place

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.