Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 988797
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T05:41:21+00:00 2026-05-16T05:41:21+00:00

I’m slightly confused about runtime polymorphism. Correct me if I am wrong, but to

  • 0

I’m slightly confused about runtime polymorphism. Correct me if I am wrong, but to my knowledge, runtime polymorphism means that function definitions will get resolved at runtime.

Take this example:

class a
{
a();
~a();
void baseclass();
}

class b: class a
{
b();
~b();
void derivedclass1();
}

class c: class a
{
c();
~c();
void derivedclass2();
}

Calling methodology:

b derived1;
a *baseptr = &derived1; //here base pointer knows that i'm pointing to derived class b. 
baseptr->derivedclass1();

In the above calling methodology, the base class knows that it’s pointing to derived class b.

So where does the ambiguity exist?

In what cases will the function definitions get resolved at runtime?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T05:41:21+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 5:41 am

    There is no ambiguity exists in the example provided.

    If the base class has the same function name as the derived class, and if you call in the way you specified, it will call the base class’s function instead of the derived class one.

    In such cases, you can use the virtual keyword, to ensure that the function gets called from the object that it is currently being pointed. It is resolved during the run time.

    Here you can find more explanation..

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.