Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 80353
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T21:17:22+00:00 2026-05-10T21:17:22+00:00

I’m still trying to get my head around using Java’s generics. I have no

  • 0

I’m still trying to get my head around using Java’s generics. I have no problems at all with using typed collections, but much of the rest of it just seems to escape me.

Right now I’m trying to use the JUnit ‘PrivateAccessor’, which requires a Class[] argument with a list of all the argument types for the private method being called. In Java 1.4, I’d define that as

Class[] args = new Class[] { Collection.class, ArrayList.class }; 

but the actual code is defined to now take the arguments

myMethod(Collection<MyClass1> first, ArrayList<MyClass2> second) 

I tried to change the definition of args to be

Class<? extends Object>[] args = new Class<? extends Object>[]  { Collection<MyClass1>.class, ArrayList<MyClass2>.class }; 

But Eclipse puts a red marker on the closing >s, and says it’s expecting ‘void’ at that point. Can I do this using generics, or shouldn’t I bother?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T21:17:22+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 9:17 pm

    The first problem you have is that you should be using

    Class<?>[] args = new Class[] 

    instead of

    Class<? extends Object>[] args = new Class<? extends Object>[] 

    This explains why.

    Your second problem is that you should be using

    { Collection.class, ArrayList.class }; 

    instead of

    { Collection<MyClass1>.class, ArrayList<MyClass2>.class }; 

    This is because XXX.class is evaluated at runtime, after type erasure has been performed, so specifying the type argument is useless, hence forbidden.

    I highly recommend the FAQ from which I’ve linked the two explanations above for an ‘earthly’ take on Java generics that will clarify most questions.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 73k
  • Answers 73k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer super() only works for new-style classes May 11, 2026 at 1:57 pm
  • added an answer A collegue of mine has just pointed me at this… May 11, 2026 at 1:57 pm
  • added an answer Styling file inputs are notoriously difficult, as most browsers will… May 11, 2026 at 1:57 pm

Related Questions

I keep getting tasks that are above my skill level. How can I address this without coming accross as grossly incompetent?
I have a web-service that I will be deploying to dev, staging and production.
I'm thinking of starting a wiki, probably on a low cost LAMP hosting account.
I have the following tables in my database that have a many-to-many relationship, which
I'm using the RESTful authentication Rails plugin for an app I'm developing. I'm having
I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is
Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.