Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4327380
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T09:31:48+00:00 2026-05-21T09:31:48+00:00

im stuck with the dilemma of defining multiple objects with different names, i would

  • 0

im stuck with the dilemma of defining multiple objects with different names, i would like to define an amount of objects according to an amount i need taken from another part of the program

the part object(i) isnt correct, i just put it there to illustrate my problem

    for(int i = 1; i <= amountOfObjectsNeeded; i++){

        someclass object(i) = new someclass();
    }

does anyone know how to get around this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T09:31:49+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 9:31 am

    You should use an array in this case:

    Someclass[] array = new Someclass[amountOfObjectsNeeded];
    for (int i = 0; i < amountOfObjectsNeeded; i++) {
        array[i] = new Someclass();
    }
    

    Note how the loop starts from 0 rather than 1–arrays in Java are indexed starting at 0.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm stuck on a PHP 4 server, and I would like to start moving
I seem to be mentally stuck in a Flyweight pattern dilemma. First, let's say
I'm a bit stuck on this. Basically I want to do something like the
I have a strange dilemma.... First of all, I am stuck using XPath 1.0
I'm making an ERD of my database, and am stuck with a little dilemma.
Stuck using a table layout like this below with a lot of content in
Stuck with me HW - Need to try complexity time=0; for (i=n; i>=1; i
I stuck at defining a static pointer inside one of my class which is
Im stuck on this httpWebRequest problem. I need to send XML to a website.
really stuck, any help and/or comments would be greatly appreciated! I've written a database

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.