Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 646333
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T21:36:00+00:00 2026-05-13T21:36:00+00:00

I’m testing a C++ class with a number of functions that all have basically

  • 0

I’m testing a C++ class with a number of functions that all have basically the same form:

ClassUnderTest t;

DATATYPE data = { 0 };
try
{
    t.SomeFunction( &data );
}
catch( const SomeException& e )
{
    // log known error
}
catch( ... )
{
    // log unknown error
}

Since there’s a lot of these, I thought I’d write a function to do most of the heavy lifting:

template< typename DATA, typename TestFunction >
int DoTest( TestFunction test_fcn )
{
    DATA data = { 0 };
    try
    {
        test_fcn( &data );
    }
    catch( const SomeException& e )
    {
        // log known error
        return FAIL;
    }
    catch( ... )
    {
        // log unknown error
        return FAIL;
    }
    return TRUE;
}

ClassUnderTest t;
DoTest< DATATYPE >( boost::bind( &ClassUnderTest::SomeFunction, boost::ref( t ) ) );

But, the compiler doesn’t seem to agree with me that this is a good idea…

Warning 1   warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored   c:\boost\boost_1_41_0\boost\bind\bind.hpp   1657
Warning 2   warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored   c:\boost\boost_1_41_0\boost\bind\mem_fn.hpp 318
Warning 3   warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored   c:\boost\boost_1_41_0\boost\bind\mem_fn.hpp 326
Warning 4   warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored   c:\boost\boost_1_41_0\boost\bind\mem_fn.hpp 331
Warning 5   warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored   c:\boost\boost_1_41_0\boost\bind\mem_fn.hpp 345
Warning 6   warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored   c:\boost\boost_1_41_0\boost\bind\mem_fn.hpp 350
Warning 7   warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored   c:\boost\boost_1_41_0\boost\bind\mem_fn.hpp 362
Error   8   fatal error C1001: An internal error has occurred in the compiler.  c:\boost\boost_1_41_0\boost\bind\mem_fn.hpp 328

I’m using Visual Studio 2008 SP1.
If anybody can point out what I’m doing wrong, I would appreciate it.

Thanks,
PaulH

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T21:36:01+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:36 pm

    The error is in your code, not in bind. You pass a functor that does not expect any arguments. Instead of your call, do

    DoTest< DATATYPE >( boost::bind( &ClassUnderTest::SomeFunction, &t, _1) );
    

    If you omit _1 then bind will create a zero-argument function object, and the member function (which expects a data pointer) will miss one argument when called by bind.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6
I have a bunch of posts stored in text files formatted in yaml/textile (from
I am trying to loop through a bunch of documents I have to put
I'm making a simple page using Google Maps API 3. My first. One marker

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.