Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 260605
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T22:21:43+00:00 2026-05-11T22:21:43+00:00

I’m thinking about throwing away my DB in my next project to simplify development/evolution.

  • 0

I’m thinking about throwing away my DB in my next project to simplify development/evolution.

One way to do it is not to leave the Objects realm at all and persist my objects by some kind of serialization. It would be nice to be able to edit the initial object state when the app is down, so a format like JSON would be great.

The problem is that JSON tools (like Java Jackson), or rather JSON itself, are not able to keep the references, so after deserializing object graph I can get more instances than I got before serialization – each reference to the same object gets new instance.

I’ve noticed JSPON but it doesn’t seem to be alive.

What do you think about such approach – isn’t it too simple to be possible? Or maybe I should use some OODB (although it would create additional configurational overhead and I want to keep it simple).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T22:21:44+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:21 pm

    Most of the simple portable serializers (xml, json, protocol buffers) are tree serializers (not graph serializers), so you’ll see this problem a bit…

    You could perhaps try using a DTO tree that doesn’t need the references? i.e. instead of:

    Parent -(children)-> Child
           <--(parent)--
    

    you have (at the DTO level):

    Parent {Key="abc"} -(child keys)-> {string}
    Child {Key="def"} -(parent key)-> {string}
    

    This should be usable with any tree serializer; but it does require extra (manual) processing.

    There are graph-based serializers like .NET’s DataContractSerializer (with graph-mode enabled; it is disabled by default); but this is non-portable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 133k
  • Answers 133k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer That is not safe. Your process can be killed between… May 12, 2026 at 6:38 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I have plenty of hands on threading experience in a… May 12, 2026 at 6:38 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer In PHP, this syntax is called a heredoc. The linked… May 12, 2026 at 6:38 am

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.