Home/ Questions/Q 604893
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-13T17:05:14+00:00

I’m (thoroughly) learning SQL at the moment and came across the GROUP BY clause.

  • 0

I’m (thoroughly) learning SQL at the moment and came across the GROUP BYclause.

GROUP BY aggregates or groups the resultset according to the argument(s) you give it. If you use this clause in a query you can then perform aggregate functions on the resultset to find statistical information on the resultset like finding averages (AVG()) or frequency (COUNT()).

My question is: is the GROUP BY statement in any way useful without an accompanying aggregate function?

Update
Using GROUP BY as a synonym for DISTINCT is (probably) a bad idea because I suspect it is slower.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    is the GROUP BY statement in any way useful without an accompanying aggregate function?

    Using DISTINCT would be a synonym in such a situation, but the reason you’d want/have to define a GROUP BY clause would be in order to be able to define HAVING clause details.

    If you need to define a HAVING clause, you have to define a GROUP BY – you can’t do it in conjunction with DISTINCT.

    • 0