Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3341176
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T00:41:34+00:00 2026-05-18T00:41:34+00:00

I’m trying to compile an open-source project . One of the steps involves running

  • 0

I’m trying to compile an open-source project.

One of the steps involves running a .mak file which has the following line:

kbddvp32.dll: kbddvp32.obj kbddvp.res
        $(LINK32) -nologo -dll -base:0x5FFF0000 -subsystem:native -def:kbddvp.def -noentry \
             -merge:.edata=.data -merge:.rdata=.data -merge:.text=.data -merge:.bss=.data \
         -ignore:4078,4070 -section:.data,re -opt:nowin98 -stack:0x40000,0x1000 -opt:ref,icf \
         -release -out:$@ $**

… that becomes:

link -machine:ix86 -nologo -dll -base:0x5FFF0000 -subsystem:native -def:
kbddvp.def -noentry  -merge:.edata=.data -merge:.rdata=.data -merge:.text=.data
-merge:.bss=.data  -ignore:4078,4070 -section:.data,re -opt:nowin98 -stack:0x400
00,0x1000 -opt:ref,icf  -release -out:kbddvp32.dll kbddvp32.obj kbddvp.res

… and when executes, produces the following warnings:

LINK : warning LNK4224: /OPT:NOWIN98 is no longer supported;  ignored
   Creating library kbddvp32.lib and object kbddvp32.exp
LINK : warning LNK4254: section '.edata' (40000040) merged into '.data' (C000004
0) with different attributes
LINK : warning LNK4254: section '.rdata' (40000040) merged into '.data' (C000004
0) with different attributes
LINK : warning LNK4254: section '.text' (60000020) merged into '.data' (C0000040
) with different attributes
LINK : warning LNK4254: section '.bss' (C0000080) merged into '.data' (C0000040)
 with different attributes

I tried reading the documentation for warning LNK4254, but I don’t know enough about link.exe to understand how to fix it.

The file kbddvp.def contains:

LIBRARY KBDDVP

EXPORTS
    KbdLayerDescriptor  @1

The .mak file links to this page which it seems to be based off of, and is the reason the -merge: parts are used in the first place. I realize that this page says that you can use MSKLC 1.4 instead, however it doesn’t support all the features I want to implement.

How can I solve these LNK4254 warnings, or can I safely ignore them?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T00:41:34+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 12:41 am

    What happens here originally is that all sections are merged into .data,
    and then its attributes are set to Read, Execute.

    The warnings are because the other sections’ attributes are different before
    they are merged. However, since the new merged section .data have its attributes
    explicitly set, you can ignore it.

    You can verify this by comparing the output of these two commands:

    link /dump /section:.data kbddvp32.dll
    link /dump /section:.data kbdus.dll
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.