Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9213267
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T01:42:23+00:00 2026-06-18T01:42:23+00:00

I’m trying to convert a JavaScript-heavy page to use TypeScript, with RequireJS to manage

  • 0

I’m trying to convert a JavaScript-heavy page to use TypeScript, with RequireJS to manage the module dependencies.

The problem I’ve got is that, as well as the inter-dependencies between the TypeScript files, the page also depends on some common JavaScript files that are shared with other parts of the system, not yet converted to AMD.

Is it very dangerous to put non-AMD scripts in normal <SCRIPT> tags above the tag for Require, and just assume that they’re loaded?

If that’s a bad idea, what’s a better way to handle this? Do I need to have AMD and non-AMD version of each script? Or do I need to convert all scripts so that they optionally call define()?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T01:42:24+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 1:42 am

    Recent versions of RequireJS allow you to pretend that the plain JS files are actually AMD modules that just return nothing.

    The most recent version I tried – 2.1.4 – actually allows you to treat plain JS files like modules. Example:

    require(
        [
            'path/to/module' // <- AMD module
            ,'path/to/plainjs' // <- actually a plain JS file
        ]
        , function(module, plain){
            // module will be per define in that file.
            // plain will be 'undefined' type
        }
    )
    

    You can just mix module-like refs to plain JS files freely. As long as they are loaded in the right order, they will update whatever globals they update and you get what you want. Example:

    require(['js/underscore'], function(){
    
        // nesting to insure Underscore, a prereq to BackBone
        // completes loading before backbone starts
        require(
            [
                'path/to/module' // <- AMD module
                ,'js/backbone' // <- actually a plain JS file
            ]
            , function(module){
                // module will be per define in that file.
    
                window.BackBone // is available for you
    
            }
        )
    
    })
    

    Note, while RequireJS used to require that you add “.js” to the end of the plain JS files to indicate that they are plain JS, in the examples above you do NOT use “.js” This, extension-less module reference allows the module ID to follow paths and maps aliases, while ids with .js are treated as literal and are never translated.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to convert HTML to plain text. I get many &\#8217; &\#8220; etc.
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
Basically, what I'm trying to create is a page of div tags, each has
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have a small JavaScript validation script that validates inputs based on Regex. I
I am trying to render a haml file in a javascript response like so:
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I'm trying to use string.replace('’','') to replace the dreaded weird single-quote character: ’ (aka
I'm trying to create an if statement in PHP that prevents a single post

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.