Home/ Questions/Q 854581
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-15T07:56:45+00:00

I’m trying to create a Regex javascript split, but I’m totally stuck. Here’s my

  • 0

I’m trying to create a Regex javascript split, but I’m totally stuck. Here’s my input:

9:30 pm
The user did action A.

10:30 pm
Welcome, user John Doe.

***This is a comment

11:30 am
This is some more input.

I want the output array after the split() to be (I’ve removed the \n for readability):

["9:30 pm The user did action A.", "10:30 pm Welcome, user John Doe.", "***This is a comment", "11:30 am This is some more input." ];

My current regular expression is:

var split = text.split(/\s*(?=(\b\d+:\d+|\*\*\*))/);

This works, but there is one problem: the timestamps get repeated in extra elements. So I get: 

["9:30", "9:30 pm The user did action A.", "10:30",  "10:30 pm Welcome, user John Doe.", "***This is a comment", "11:30", "11:30 am This is some more input." ];

I cant split on the newlines \n because they aren’t consistent, and sometimes there may be no newlines at all.

Could you help me out with a Regex for this?

Thanks so much!!

EDIT: in reply to phleet

It could look like this:

9:30 pm
The user did action A.

He also did action B

10:30 pm Welcome, user John Doe.

Basically, there may or may not be a newline after the timestamp, and there may be multiple newlines for the event description.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    I believe the issue is with regards to how Javascript’s split treats capturing groups. The solution may just be to use non-capturing group in your pattern. That is, instead of:

    /\s*(?=(\b\d+:\d+|\*\*\*))/

    Use

    /\s*(?=(?:\b\d+:\d+|\*\*\*))/
        ^^

    The (?:___) is what is called a non-capturing group.

    Looking at the overall pattern, however, the grouping is not actually needed. You should be able to just use:

    /\s*(?=\b\d+:\d+|\*\*\*)/

    References

    Minor point

    Instead of \*\*\*, you could use [*]{3}. This may be more readable. The * is not a meta-character inside a character class definition, so it doesn’t have to be escaped. The {3} is how you denote “exactly 3 repetition of”.

    References

    • 0