Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 597475
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T16:17:05+00:00 2026-05-13T16:17:05+00:00

I’m trying to create an abstract class, defining an abstract method, that is to

  • 0

I’m trying to create an abstract class, defining an abstract method, that is to be derived from other classes that implements some specific behavior in the abstract method. I want the abstract class to contain some kind of state information that represents however the implementation in the derived classes exited without errors, but I want to implement all state handling in AbstractClass and not in the deriving classes. I want to make the deriving classes totally unaware of the functionality in AbstractClass. Below is an example. I made comments in the code to describe what I’m trying to achieve.

public abstract class AbstractClass
    {
        public void Start()
        {
            ThreadStart ts = new ThreadStart(PerformWork);
            Thread t = new Thread(ts);
            t.Start();
            Thread.Sleep(2000);

            // Dependent on if ReportWork exited without expcetions
            // I want to call ReportSuccess or ReportFailure from this method.
            // However, I dont want to implement any reporting functionallity (or
            // as little as possible)
            // into the deriving classes PerformWork() method. Simply put
            // I want the deriving classes to be totally unaware of the reporting. 

        }

        public void ReportSuccess()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Success!");
        }

        public void ReportFailure()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Failure!");
        }
        public abstract void PerformWork();
    }

A class deriving from AbstractClass:

class ConcreteImplementationClass:AbstractClass
    {
        public override void PerformWork()
        {
            // Implements some functionality
            // without knowing anything about
            // whats going on in AbstractClass.           
        }
    }

Do anyone have any advice for how I could achieve this functionality, or how I could create something similar?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T16:17:06+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 4:17 pm

    If I understand this correctly you want to call ReportSuccess() if the PerformWork() is successfully and ReportFailure() if it fails?

    Why not change

    public abstract void PerformWork();
    

    to

    public void Start()
    {
        bool result = false;
    
        // This will enable Perform work to operate in its own thread
        Action threadAction = new Action(() =>
            {
                result = PerformWork();
            });
    
        ThreadStart ts = new ThreadStart(threadAction);
        Thread t = new Thread(ts);
        t.Start();
        Thread.Sleep(2000);
    
        // Dependent on if ReportWork exited without expcetions
        // I want to call ReportSuccess or ReportFailure from this method.
        // However, I dont want to implement any reporting functionallity (or
        // as little as possible)
        // into the deriving classes PerformWork() method. Simply put
        // I want the deriving classes to be totally unaware of the reporting. 
    
        if(result)
        {
            ReportSuccess();
        }
        else
        {
            ReportFailure();
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.