Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6029321
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T04:52:09+00:00 2026-05-23T04:52:09+00:00

I’m trying to do a virtual relationship (what I call it – don’t know

  • 0

I’m trying to do a “virtual relationship” (what I call it – don’t know if there’s a real term for it) in Rails. Here’s one that I have that is definitely working: Address belongs_to Business and Business has_many Addresses. Addresses have a ‘category’ column: either Mailing or Physical. In theory, a business could have any number of each type, but in practice they have exactly one of each. So my models look like this:

class Address < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :business
end

class Business < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :addresses
  has_one  :physical_address, :class_name => 'Address', :conditions => ["category = ?", "Physical"]
  has_one  :mailing_address, :class_name => 'Address', :conditions => ["category = ?", "Mailing"]
end

Thus, I have two “virtual” has_one’s, so that I can conveniently access either one (as business.physical_address or business.mailing_address) without having to do the work of separating them myself.

Now I’m trying to do something similar, but with a has_many :through. Here’s my new scenario. I have a simple many-to-many relationship with a join. Let’s say A has many J‘s, B also has many J‘s, and J belongs_to both A and B. However, A also has_many B‘s through J. So I can access them as a.bs.

However, the entries in B also have a ‘category’. So as with the Business/Address example above, I want to have “virtual” has-one/many-through relationships in A, so I don’t have to manually separate the B‘s by category. I tried something like this (assuming A‘s have exactly one B with category=’Type 1′):

class A < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :js
  has_many :bs, :through => js
  has_one  :b_type1, :class_name => 'B', :through => :js, :conditions => ["category = ?", "Type 1"]
end

However, when I do a find on A‘s, the resulting objects do not have a b_type1 property in them.

Is it even possible to do what I’m trying to do?? Any help is appreciated.

Edit: I am needing this to be serialized to an Adobe Flex frontend (using the RestfulX framework). According to this thread, I can’t use just a method as @Andrew suggests below because the resulting object will not get properly serialized without some heavy-duty effort.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T04:52:10+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 4:52 am

    The has_one association you wrote should work exactly as you want it, however Rails won’t be able to guess the field from :b_type1.

    Just as you explicitly specified the class name, try specifying the source:

    has_one :b_type1, :class_name => 'B', :through => :js, :source => bs, :conditions => ["category = ?", "Type 1"]
    

    I tested a similar finder and it worked as you would expect it to.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
Basically, what I'm trying to create is a page of div tags, each has
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I am trying to loop through a bunch of documents I have to put
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I'm making a simple page using Google Maps API 3. My first. One marker

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.