Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6164993
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T22:05:16+00:00 2026-05-23T22:05:16+00:00

I’m trying to do something similar to this question. I’ve got a main app

  • 0

I’m trying to do something similar to this question.

I’ve got a main app A, and sub-apps B and C. B is a searchable dictionary, and C is a definition, so if you search for many words, you can end up with the stack looking like A > B > C > B > B > C > B > C > C > C… etc

Whenever I go back, I’d like to go back to the original B, so I want the back stack to basically stay at A > B all the time.

I’ve currently got it set up using an Intent so when the back button is pressed from C, it goes to a new instance of B, but that’s obviously not what I want.

Ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T22:05:17+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 10:05 pm

    Shouldn’t hitting BACK from C take you to the original B? So the stack should look like:

    A>
      B>
        C<
      B>
        C>
          C<
        C<
      B<
    A
    

    with > going to the next activity, and < being the back button?

    You could override onBackPressed for all the activities, so for C it loads a new B, B it loads a new A, and A you would do moveTaskToBack(true);, but that’s less of a solution and more of a hack to make it work.

    Try to use onResume so that B comes up like it would on default. Set any pertinent variables to what they are in a new activity. If you only want this when you’re coming from C, have a class boolean that is set to true when C is loaded, and check it in onResume or onRestart. If it’s true, set everything to default/blank, and set the boolean to false. If not, load it how it was (this is if they hit home and come back to the app, basically). I’m not at my work desk, but I think you’ll want:

    @Override
        public void onResume() {
            super.onResume();
            if(fromC == true){
            //Set all variables to load default dictionary
            fromC = false;
            }
        }
    }
    

    This should make the original B act like a new B.

    Or instead, you could do it the easy way, and when you call the intent to load a new B like this:

    startActivity(getIntent());
    finish();
    

    That’ll make there only be one B. Making it load as a blank when you go back is a little bit different and requires class variables, or some other tricky trick that I am thinking of. This is something like what you’ll want to do: .zip of small sample

    If you can get your code reworked to something like that almost (where you can use the appropriate variables to set up things to work right if that makes any sense).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
Basically, what I'm trying to create is a page of div tags, each has
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I am trying to loop through a bunch of documents I have to put
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.