Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 169957
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T12:43:22+00:00 2026-05-11T12:43:22+00:00

I’m trying to figure out if it is possible to instantiate and invoke a

  • 0

I’m trying to figure out if it is possible to instantiate and invoke a delegate by name, rather than explicitly. I think the code belows explains it fairly well….I want to accept a function name, and then instantiate the delegate based on that. In the example I use a select case, but I want to eliminate that and just use the methodName argument itself.

Respectfully…please avoid the urge to tell me this is insane and I should be taking some entirely different approach to this. 🙂

    Private Delegate Sub myDelegate()        Private Sub myDelegate_Implementation1()         'Some code     End Sub     Private Sub myDelegate_Implementation2()         'Some code     End Sub      Public Sub InvokeMethod(ByVal methodName As String)         Dim func As myDelegate = Nothing         '??? HOW TO GET RID OF THIS SELECT CASE BLOCK?:         Select Case methodName             Case 'myDelegate_Implementation1'                 func = AddressOf myDelegate_Implementation1             Case 'myDelegate_Implementation2'                 func = AddressOf myDelegate_Implementation2         End Select         func.Invoke()     End Sub 

Thanks Keith, exactly what I was looking for. (BFree’s approach would work as well in most circumstances though).

Here’s the working code in VB:

Public Delegate Sub xxxDelegate()  Sub xxxAnImplementation()  End Sub  Sub zzzDoIt(ByVal xxxImplementerName As String)     Dim theDelegate As xxxDelegate = CType(System.Delegate.CreateDelegate(GetType(xxxDelegate), Me, xxxImplementerName), xxxDelegate)     theDelegate.Invoke() End Sub  Private Sub LoadFunctions()     Dim thisClass As Type = Type.GetType(Me.GetType.BaseType.FullName.ToString)     For Each method As MethodInfo In thisClass.GetMethods(System.Reflection.BindingFlags.DeclaredOnly)         If 1 = 1 OrElse method.Name.Substring(0, 3) = 'Get' Then             Me.ddlCodeSamples.Items.Add(method.Name)         End If     Next End Sub 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T12:43:23+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 12:43 pm

    If you have a delegate for the method you can also do this:

    public delegate void MethodDelegate( ... ) ...  //create the delegate we expect (MethodDelegate) Delegate.CreateDelegate(     typeof( MethodDelegate ), this, 'methodName', true ); 

    C#, I know, but the similar will work in VB.

    Normally I’d go with @BFree’s answer, but this works well when working with event driven reflection – I think this will be slightly quicker if calling the result delegate lots of times.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
I'm trying to convert HTML to plain text. I get many &\#8217; &\#8220; etc.
I'm new to using the Perl treebuilder module for HTML parsing and can't figure
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
Basically, what I'm trying to create is a page of div tags, each has
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I am trying to render a haml file in a javascript response like so:
I have this code to decode numeric html entities to the UTF8 equivalent character.
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.