Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3690780
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T04:04:25+00:00 2026-05-19T04:04:25+00:00

I’m trying to figure out the most efficient and scalable way to implement a

  • 0

I’m trying to figure out the most efficient and scalable way to implement a processing queue mechanism in a sql database. The short of it is, I have a bunch of ‘Domain’ objects with associated ‘Backlink’ statistics. I want to figure out efficiently which Domains need to have their Backlinks processed.

Domain table: id, domainName

Backlinks table: id, domainId, count, checkedTime

The Backlinks table has many records (to keep a history) to one Domain record.
I need to efficiently select domains that are due to have their Backlinks processed. This could mean that the Backlinks record with the most recent checkedTime is far enough in the past, or that there is no Backlinks record at all for a domain record. Domains will need to be ordered for processing by a number of factors, including ordering by the oldest checkedTime first.

There are multiple ‘readers’ processing domains. If the same domain gets processed twice it’s not a huge deal, but it is a waste of cpu cycles.

The worker takes an indeterminate amount of time to process a domain. I would prefer to have some backup in the sense that a checkout would ‘expire’ rather than require the worker process to explicitly ‘checkin’ a record when it’s finished, in case the worker fails for some reason.

The big issue here is scaling. From the start I’ll easily have about 2 million domains, and that number will keep growing daily. This means my Backlinks history will grow quickly too, as I expect to process in some cases daily, and other cases weekly for each domain.
The question becomes, what is the most efficient way to find domains that require backlinks processing?

Thanks for your help!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T04:04:26+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 4:04 am

    I decided to structure things a bit differently. Instead of finding domains that need to be processed based on the criteria of several tables, I’m assigning a date at which each metric needs to be processed for a given domain. This makes finding those domains needing processing much simpler of a query.

    I ended up using the idea of batches where I find domains to process, mark them as being processed by a batch id, then return those domains to the worker. When the worker is done, it returns the results, and the batch is deleted, and the domains will naturally be ready for processing again in the future.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am trying to loop through a bunch of documents I have to put
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have a bunch of posts stored in text files formatted in yaml/textile (from
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString
I'm making a simple page using Google Maps API 3. My first. One marker
I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.