I’m trying to figure out when to use the bang! versions for saving and updating records? I’ve read and heard that you don’t need them if you’re just saving one record or updating a single attribute, if you’re confident nothing should go wrong, or to always use them outside of a controller. I guess I’m paranoid about having multiple things getting saved then something fails then there is incomplete data in the DB. The current Rails project I’m working on is over 50% complete and currently doesn’t contain any bangs. I have some custom methods I’m calling in models that update or create multiple records and worry if they should be in some sort of transaction.
Sorry if this seems scattered but I’m just trying to figure how to use the saving capabilities in ActiveRecord correctly and make my life easier and little more stress free in the end. Thanks for your time.
Generally you want to use the non-bang versions in your controllers. This allows logic like this:
I find myself using the bang versions a lot in tests when I want to make sure I know if something doesn’t validate, and isn’t saved. I’ve definitely wasted time debugging tests that were failing because of changed model validations, which would be obvious if I used the bang versions.
e.g.
In terms of not having invalid data in the database, you should be handling this with ActiveRecord validations (e.g.
validates_presence_of :user_id), or defining your ownvalidatemethod in the model. (http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Validations/ClassMethods.html) This should prevent saves from occurring if your data isn’t valid. If you’re really paranoid you can add some constraints to your database. Check theActiveRecord::Migrationdocs for how to set up unique indexes and other database constraints in your migrations.Also in my experience you want to avoid using any custom save or create method whenever possible. If you re-implement functionality included in ActiveRecord you end up paying a price down the road. http://matthewpaulmoore.com/post/5190436725/ruby-on-rails-code-quality-checklist has more to say on this.