Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1018461
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T10:51:38+00:00 2026-05-16T10:51:38+00:00

I’m trying to figure out why this works: >>> comments = Comment.objects.all() >>>[c.content_object for

  • 0

I’m trying to figure out why this works:

>>> comments = Comment.objects.all() 
>>>[c.content_object for c in comments] 

[returns a list of the objects the comments are attached to]

But this doesn’t:

>>> c = Comment.objects.filter(id=111) 
>>> c 

[<Comment: Related object name here ...>] 
>>> c.content_object 

Traceback (most recent call last): 
  File "<console>", line 1, in <module> 
AttributeError: 'QuerySet' object has no attribute 'content_object' 

In both cases, each “c” is a Comment instance. So why does c have a content_object property in the first case but not in the second? Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T10:51:39+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 10:51 am

    No, in both cases you get a queryset. In the first one, you iterate through and get the content_object for every item in the queryset – but in the second one, you try and call it on the entire queryset, for some reason. If you iterated through the second one in the same way as you do the first, it would work.

    Alternatively, and this is probably what you actually wanted to do, you could use:

    c = Comment.objects.get(id=111)
    

    to get the actual Comment object with ID 111, rather than a queryset consisting of one element.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am trying to loop through a bunch of documents I have to put
I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6
I have a bunch of posts stored in text files formatted in yaml/textile (from
I'm making a simple page using Google Maps API 3. My first. One marker

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.