Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6761399
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T14:11:09+00:00 2026-05-26T14:11:09+00:00

I’m trying to fix up the error handling in my postscript interpreter, and I’m

  • 0

I’m trying to fix up the error handling in my postscript interpreter, and I’m having difficulty coming up with ways for the handler to execute when one of the stacks is full.

The postscript-level handler procedure I’m using is the “standard” one described in Frank Merritt Braswell, Inside Postscript.

/.error {
    //$error exch /errorname exch put
    //$error exch /command exch put
    //$error /newerror true put
    //$error /errorname get /VMerror ne {
        //$error /ostackarray get null eq {
            //$error /estackarray 250 array put
            //$error /ostackarray 6000 array put
            //$error /dstackarray 30 array put
        } if
        count
        //$error /ostackarray get exch 0 exch getinterval astore
        //$error exch /ostack exch put
        //$error /dstack //$error /dstackarray get dictstack put
        //$error /estack //$error /estackarray get execstack
        dup length 2 sub 0 exch getinterval put
        //$error /ostack get aload pop
    } if
    //$error /initializing get {
        handleerror
    } if
    interrupt
} def

So it needs space on the operand stack (for the $error dictionary and names and stuff) and execution stack (for the procedure bodies, if executed). So if either stack has overflowed, where is this space supposed to come from?

I attempted to tackle the execstackoverflow first, since fewer operators use the execstack than use the operand stack. I defined a “buffer” size

#define ERRDEPTH 5 /*space reserved on execstack for error handling*/

which all “exec” operator functions add to the space check. Eg. here’s the exec operator.

void Aexec(state *st, object x) { (void)st;
    if ((tes-es)+1+ERRDEPTH >= ESSIZE) error(st,execstackoverflow);
    pushe(x);
}

And then the interpreter loop checks for a much smaller size (so it doesn’t trigger even more errors while trying to run the handler).

bool eval (state *st) {
    ...
    /* room to work? */
    if ((tes-es) + 2 /*+ ERRDEPTH*/ > ESSIZE) error(st,execstackoverflow);
    ...

But it doesn’t work (SEGFAULT) unless I clear up some space in the C-level error handler, just before it pushes (schedules) the PS handler on the execstack.

...
    if (e == execstackoverflow) { /* make some room! */
        (void)pope(); (void)pope(); (void)pope(); (void)pope(); (void)pope();
        (void)pope(); (void)pope(); (void)pope(); (void)pope(); (void)pope();
    }
...

But now I’ve thrown the baby out with the bathwater! Those entries on the top of the stack might just be the crucial information for fixing the error, and I’ve just tossed them into the abyss.

Can anyone suggest a better way of going about this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T14:11:10+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 2:11 pm

    Without knowing too much about your code, I would imagine creating an error stack that can expand itself would be the solution.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
Basically, what I'm trying to create is a page of div tags, each has
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
I'm trying to use string.replace('’','') to replace the dreaded weird single-quote character: ’ (aka
I'm trying to create an if statement in PHP that prevents a single post
I'm having trouble keeping the paragraph square between the quote marks. In firefox the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.