I’m trying to implement a default valued map, and I’d like filters, maps, etc. over a DefaultingMap to also produce a DefaultingMap whenever possible. Here’s my initial implementation:
class DefaultingMap[K, V](defaultValue: => V)
extends mutable.HashMap[K, V]
with mutable.MapLike[K, V, DefaultingMap[K, V]] {
override def empty = new DefaultingMap[K, V](defaultValue)
override def default(key: K): V = {
val result = this.defaultValue
this(key) = result
result
}
}
I get objects of type DefaultingMap when I use filter, but not when I use map:
scala> val counter = new DefaultingMap[Char, Int](0)
counter: DefaultingMap[Char,Int] = Map()
scala> for (c <- "ababcbbb") counter(c) += 1
scala> counter.filter{case (k, v) => v > 1}
res1: DefaultingMap[Char,Int] = Map((a,2), (b,5))
scala> counter.map{case (k, v) => (k, v * 2)}
res2: scala.collection.mutable.HashMap[Char,Int] = Map((a,4), (c,2), (b,10))
The difference between these two methods seems to be that map takes an implicit CanBuildFrom. So I gather that I need to have an implicit def somewhere to provide the CanBuildFrom. My first intuition was to do what’s done in HashMap:
object DefaultingMap extends generic.MutableMapFactory[DefaultingMap] {
def empty[K, V]: DefaultingMap[K, V] = // Not possible!
implicit def canBuildFrom[K, V]:
generic.CanBuildFrom[Coll, (K, V), DefaultingMap[K, V]] =
new MapCanBuildFrom[K, V]
}
I believe this would get it to compile, but this approach won’t work because it’s impossible to define the empty method – you need to know what the defaultValue should be. If I could define the CanBuildFrom in the class itself, instead of the companion object, I would be okay because the defaultValue is available there.
How can I get this to work?
Mutable maps are
Builders in Scala, so theMapFactoryby default takes an empty map of the type in question to obtain a builder.If you have custom map build rules, one of the things you can do is to define your custom factory similar to
collection.generic.MapFactory. You would have to define it in a similar way like there, but make both theemptymethod and thenewBuildermethod take an additional argument for thedefaultValue.Something along the lines of (if you read more about the Scala 2.8 collections API in the other link suggested, you’ll find that you don’t have to implement generic companion objects for maps):
Prints:
I admit, still, this does not solve the problem for the parameterless
apply.