Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 536603
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T09:50:22+00:00 2026-05-13T09:50:22+00:00

I’m trying to implement a very simple XML schema constraint. The idref attribute on

  • 0

I’m trying to implement a very simple XML schema constraint.

The idref attribute on elements of
type <batz> should only be
allowed to have a value that matches
the id attribute on at least one
element <bar>.

If that doesn’t make any sense to you then please just look at the example XML-document below, I think it actually explains it better than my attempt to put it in words.

So, question: Why does xmllint let the below schema/xml combination pass (it says the document is valid)?
How to fix it to achieve the desired constraint?

The schema:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
    targetNamespace="test" xmlns="test" elementFormDefault="qualified">

    <xs:element name="foo">
        <xs:complexType>
            <xs:sequence>
                <xs:element name="bar" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
                    <xs:complexType>
                        <xs:attribute name="id" use="required" type="xs:string" />
                    </xs:complexType>
                </xs:element>
                <xs:element name="batz" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
                    <xs:complexType>
                        <xs:attribute name="idref" use="required" type="xs:string" />
                    </xs:complexType>
                </xs:element>
            </xs:sequence>
        </xs:complexType>

        <xs:key name="ID">
            <xs:selector xpath="./bar" />
            <xs:field xpath="@id" />
        </xs:key>

        <xs:keyref name="IDREF" refer="ID">
            <xs:selector xpath="./batz" />
            <xs:field xpath="@idref" />
        </xs:keyref>

    </xs:element>
</xs:schema>

The document:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<foo xmlns="test">
    <bar id="1" />
    <bar id="2" />
    <batz idref="1" /> <!-- this should succeed because <bar id="1"> exists -->
    <batz idref="3" /> <!-- this should FAIL -->
</foo>
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T09:50:22+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:50 am

    Your XML document, as shown, doesn’t include a schemaLocation. When an XML document doesn’t reference a schema or DTD, it may pass validation simply by being well-formed XML. (This once happened to a co-worker, using a different validator. I think it’s a bug that the validator didn’t at least give a warning that it was missing a schema or DTD. But I digress.)

    Anyway, it should probably be something like:

    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <foo
      xmlns="test" <!-- This is bad form, by the way... -->
      xsi:schemaLocation="test /path/to/schema/document"
        <bar id="1" />
        <bar id="2" />
        <batz idref="1" /> <!-- this should succeed because <bar id="1"> exists -->
        <batz idref="3" /> <!-- this should FAIL -->
    </foo>
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 373k
  • Answers 373k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your only problem is that System.Environment.OSVersion is static. This should… May 14, 2026 at 7:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The with statement doesn't creates a full new lexical scope,… May 14, 2026 at 7:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The script will aways execute the same way. When you… May 14, 2026 at 7:45 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.