Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1097401
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T00:25:39+00:00 2026-05-17T00:25:39+00:00

I’m trying to implement my own Hibernate NamingStrategy based on the ImprovedNamingStrategy. This is

  • 0

I’m trying to implement my own Hibernate NamingStrategy based on the ImprovedNamingStrategy. This is quite nice… only the foreign keys of many-to-many relations are ugly.

Example scenario:

public class Teacher {
    @ManyToMany
    private Set<Course> courses;
}

public class Course {
    @ManyToMany
    private Set<Teacher> teachers;
}

With my custom naming stratgy

public class MyImprovedNamingStrategy extends ImprovedNamingStrategy {

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

    @Override
    public String foreignKeyColumnName(String propertyName, String propertyEntityName, String propertyTableName, String referencedColumnName) {
        String s = super.foreignKeyColumnName(propertyName, propertyEntityName, propertyTableName, referencedColumnName);
        return s.endsWith("_id") ? s : s + "_id";
    }
}

this would lead to a table teachers_courses with the columns teachers_id, courses_id.

What i try to realize is a table named teacher_course with the fields teacher_id, course_id.
Any suggestions, how to sugularize my pluralized named properties of the entities?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T00:25:40+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 12:25 am

    this would lead to a table teachers_courses (…)

    Are you sure of this part? AFAIK, the default name of the JoinTable is made of The concatenated names of the two associated primary entity tables (owning side first), separated by an underscore (e.g. Teacher_Course).

    (…) with the columns teachers_id, courses_id.

    For this part, you’ll have to implement a depluralizing algorithm that takes English spelling into account for:

    Regular plurals

    • phases -> phase
    • kisses -> kiss (!)
    • dishes -> dish (!)
    • heroes -> hero
    • territories -> territory
    • days -> day

    Almost regular plurals

    • leaves -> leaf
    • knives -> knife

    Irregular plurals

    • sheep -> sheep
    • children -> child(!)
    • mice -> mouse
    • men – > man- women – > woman

    Honestly, this doesn’t look that easy and will probably require some kind of dictionary if you want to be correct.

    I think a better option would be to override the default names using the JoinColumn and JoinTable annotations.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.