Question

I’m trying to jump through some hoops to organize data in a special way. I’m including a simplified piece of code that demonstrates my pain.

I can’t use boost.
I’m using the latest version of g++ in cygwin.

#include <iostream>
#include <map>

using namespace std;

int main () {

    map< int,int > genmap;
    map< int,int >::iterator genmapit;
    map< map<int,int>::iterator,int > itermap;

    // insert something into genmap
    genmap.insert (make_pair(1,500) );

    // find and return iterator.
    genmapit=genmap.find(1);

    // insert the iterator/int into itermap. Dies on each of the following 3 versions of this line.
    //itermap[genmapit] = 600; // crash
    //itermap.insert ( pair< map<int,int>::iterator,int >(genmapit,600) ); // crash
    itermap.insert ( make_pair(genmapit,600) ); // crash

    return 0;
}

So as you can see, I have 1 simple map, an iterator to that map and another map that has the first argument as an iterator to the first map.

It’s clear from this:
Why can't I put an iterator in map?
That I can have an iterator as the second argument. However, the way shown above provides this:

$ make
g++    -c -o main.o main.cpp
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/include/c++/bits/stl_function.h: In member fun
ction `bool std::less<_Tp>::operator()(const _Tp&, const _Tp&) const [with _Tp =
 std::_Rb_tree_iterator<std::pair<const int, int> >]':
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/include/c++/bits/stl_tree.h:871:   instantiate
d from `std::pair<typename std::_Rb_tree<_Key, _Val, _KeyOfValue, _Compare, _All
oc>::iterator, bool> std::_Rb_tree<_Key, _Val, _KeyOfValue, _Compare, _Alloc>::i
nsert_unique(const _Val&) [with _Key = std::_Rb_tree_iterator<std::pair<const in
t, int> >, _Val = std::pair<const std::_Rb_tree_iterator<std::pair<const int, in
t> >, int>, _KeyOfValue = std::_Select1st<std::pair<const std::_Rb_tree_iterator
<std::pair<const int, int> >, int> >, _Compare = std::less<std::_Rb_tree_iterato
r<std::pair<const int, int> > >, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const std::_R
b_tree_iterator<std::pair<const int, int> >, int> >]'
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/include/c++/bits/stl_map.h:360:   instantiated
 from `std::pair<typename std::_Rb_tree<_Key, std::pair<const _Key, _Tp>, std::_
Select1st<std::pair<const _Key, _Tp> >, _Compare, _Alloc>::iterator, bool> std::
map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::insert(const std::pair<const _Key, _Tp>&) [wit
h _Key = std::_Rb_tree_iterator<std::pair<const int, int> >, _Tp = int, _Compare
 = std::less<std::_Rb_tree_iterator<std::pair<const int, int> > >, _Alloc = std:
:allocator<std::pair<const std::_Rb_tree_iterator<std::pair<const int, int> >, i
nt> >]'
main.cpp:23:   instantiated from here
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/include/c++/bits/stl_function.h:227: error: no
 match for 'operator<' in '__x < __y'
make: *** [main.o] Error 1

“instantiated from here” tells me nothing and a web search gives me no info on this.

Does STL:map simply not allow for this? I can recode my app to work around this but it will be very inefficient and I would like to get this working. Is there another kind of pointer I can make for a map element I could use?

Thanks for your time.

Answer 1

You can’t do this because std::map iterators are not random access iterators so aren’t comparable with <.

Instead, you could use pointers to the value_type in the first map as a map key.