Home/ Questions/Q 8593397
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-11T23:58:46+00:00

I’m trying to measure the time difference between 2 signals on the parallel port,

  • 0

I’m trying to measure the time difference between 2 signals on the parallel port, but first i got to know how much accurate and precise is my measuring system (AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5200+ × 2) on SUSE 12.1 x64.

So after some reading i decide to use clock_gettime(), first i get the clock_getres() value using this code:

/*
 * This program prints out the clock resolution.
 */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>

int main( void )
  {
    struct timespec res;

    if ( clock_getres( CLOCK_REALTIME, &res) == -1 ) {
      perror( "clock get resolution" );
      return EXIT_FAILURE;
    }
    printf( "Resolution is %ld nano seconds.\n",
          res.tv_nsec);
    return EXIT_SUCCESS;
  }

and the out was: 1 nano second. And i was so happy!!

But here is my problem, when i tried to check that fact with this other code:

#include <iostream>
#include <time.h>
using namespace std;

timespec diff(timespec start, timespec end);

int main()
{
    timespec time1, time2, time3,time4;
    int temp;
    time3.tv_sec=0;
    time4.tv_nsec=000000001L;
    clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &time1);
        NULL;
    clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &time2);
    cout<<diff(time1,time2).tv_sec<<":"<<diff(time1,time2).tv_nsec<<endl;
    return 0;
}

timespec diff(timespec start, timespec end)
{
    timespec temp;
    if ((end.tv_nsec-start.tv_nsec)<0) {
        temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec-start.tv_sec-1;
        temp.tv_nsec = 1000000000+end.tv_nsec-start.tv_nsec;
    } else {
        temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec-start.tv_sec;
        temp.tv_nsec = end.tv_nsec-start.tv_nsec;
    }
    return temp;
}

this one calculate the time between the two calls of clock_gettime, the time3 and time4 are declared but not used in this example because i was doing tests with them.

The output in this example is fluctuating between 978 and 1467 ns. both numbers are multiples of 489, this make me think that 489 ns is my REAL resolution. far far from the 1 ns obtained above.

My question: is there ANY WAY of getting better results? am i missing something?

I really need at least 10ns resolution for my project. Come on! a GPS can get better resolution than a PC??

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    As far as I know, Linux running on a PC will generally not be able to give you timer accuracy in the nanoseconds range. This is mainly due to the type of task/process scheduler used in the kernel. This is as much a result of the kernel as it is of the hardware.

    If you need timing with nanosecond resolution I’m afraid that you’re out of luck. However you should be able to get micro-second resolution which should be good enough for most scenarios – including your parallel port application.

    If you need timing in the nano-seconds range to be accurate to the nano-second you will need a dedicated hardware solution most likely; with a really accurate oscillator (for comparison, the base clock frequency of most x86 CPUs is in the range of mega-hertz before the multipliers)

    Finally, if you’re looking to replace the functionality of an oscilloscope with your computer that’s just not going to work beyond relatively low frequency signals. You’d be much better off investing in a scope – even a simple, portable, hand-held that plugs into your computer for displaying the data.

    • 0