Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3393968
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T04:06:50+00:00 2026-05-18T04:06:50+00:00

I’m trying to modify my test so that any database work is rolled back

  • 0

I’m trying to modify my test so that any database work is rolled back at completion. However, it seems that somewhere in the code I’m testing $dbh->commit is being explicitly called. Is there a way to override the commit method of a DBI::db object to turn of commits entirely?

I’ve tried using Test::MockObject::Extends, but that seems to cripple the $dbh:

    $dbh = ConnectToDB();
    $dbh = Test::MockObject::Extends->new( $dbh );
    $dbh->mock( 'commit', sub { warn("Caught you committing.") } );

Later on when I try to use the $dbh to do some work, I get:

Can’t locate object method “fetchrow_array” via package “T::MO::::st”

Looks like the $sth’s I ended up creating with the mocked $dbh aren’t set up correctly. Does anybody have a good method for turning commits off completely for a particular $dbh?

The database I’m connecting to is Oracle, for what it’s worth.

Update

As it turns out, we were overriding &DBI::db::commit in a method very similar to Axeman’s answer, but the commit was actually happening due to a rogue commit in a stored procedure that was being called during the run of my test.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T04:06:51+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 4:06 am

    You could do this Q&D idea:

    {
        my %old_commit;
        sub toggle_commit { 
            my $dbh   = shift;
            my $class = blessed( $dbh );
            if ( my $old_commit = $old_commit{ $class } ) {
                my $symb 
                    = do { no strict 'refs'; 
                           \*{ "$class\::commit" };
                    };
    
                *$symb = undef;
                unless ( $class->can( 'commit' )) { 
                   *{ $symb } = $old_commit;
                }
                delete $old_commit{ $class };
            }
            else {
                $old_commit{ $class } = $class->can( 'commit' );
                {   no strict 'refs'; 
                    *{ "$class\::commit" } = sub { say "Committed!" };
                }
            }
    
        }
    } 
    

    Yes, this is a fair degree of Perl black magic.

    You will have to sanity test it. Since this should only be used when testing, you should be able to partition the code so there is no chance of messing around like this in any running code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.