Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 912499
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T17:23:29+00:00 2026-05-15T17:23:29+00:00

I’m trying to optimize the reflection utilization in my code and I was wondering

  • 0

I’m trying to optimize the reflection utilization in my code and I was wondering
whether it’s possible to set multiple properties of the object at once:

Sample usage:

private void SetProperties<T>(List<T> objects, List<Tuple<string, object>> propsAndValues) where T:Task
        {
            Type type = typeof(T);
            var propInfos = propsAndValues.ToDictionary(key => type.GetProperty(key.Item1, BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.SetProperty), elem => elem.Item2);

            objects.AsParallel().ForAll(obj =>
                {
                    obj.SetProps(propInfos);                                  
                });

        }

where

public static void SetProps<T>(this T obj, Dictionary<PropertyInfo, object> propInfos) where T : Task
        {
            foreach (var propInfo in propInfos)
            {
                propInfo.Key.SetValue(obj, propInfo.Value, null);
            }            
        }

I want SetProps extension method to be replaced by something more efficient, but haven’t found anything appropriate yet.
Thanks in advance 😉

I’ve modified the code using the links provided in comments. The regular way is still 4 times faster. The question is whether this is the limit or there is a room for improvement?

class DelegateFactory
{
    public delegate void LateBoundPropertySet(object target, object value);

    public delegate void LateBoundPropertyListSet(object target, List<object> values);

    public static LateBoundPropertySet CreateSetIL(PropertyInfo property)
    {
        var method = new DynamicMethod("Set" + property.Name, null, new[] { typeof(object), typeof(object) }, true);
        var gen = method.GetILGenerator();

        var sourceType = property.DeclaringType;
        var setter = property.GetSetMethod(true);

        gen.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_0); // Load input to stack
        gen.Emit(OpCodes.Castclass, sourceType); // Cast to source type
        gen.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_1); // Load value to stack
        gen.Emit(OpCodes.Unbox_Any, property.PropertyType); // Unbox the value to its proper value type
        gen.Emit(OpCodes.Callvirt, setter); // Call the setter method
        gen.Emit(OpCodes.Ret);

        var result = (LateBoundPropertySet)method.CreateDelegate(typeof(LateBoundPropertySet));

        return result;
    }

    public static LateBoundPropertySet CreateSet(PropertyInfo property)
    {

        var setterType = typeof(Action<,>).MakeGenericType(property.DeclaringType, property.PropertyType);

        var propertyWriter = typeof(PropertyWriter<,>).MakeGenericType(property.DeclaringType, property.PropertyType);

        var setterDelegate = Delegate.CreateDelegate(setterType, property.GetSetMethod());

        var writer = (IPropertyWriter)Activator.CreateInstance(propertyWriter, setterDelegate);

        return writer.SetValue;

    }

    private interface IPropertyWriter
    {
        void SetValue(object instance, object value);
    }

    private interface IPropertyListWriter
    {

        void SetValues(object instance, List<object> values);

    }

    private class PropertyWriter<TInstance, TProperty> : IPropertyWriter
    {

        private readonly Action<TInstance, TProperty> _setValueDelegate;

        public PropertyWriter(Action<TInstance, TProperty> setValueDelegate)
        {

            _setValueDelegate = setValueDelegate;

        }

        public void SetValue(object instance, object value)
        {

            _setValueDelegate((TInstance)instance, (TProperty)value);
        }

    }

}

public static void SetProps2<T>(this T obj, Dictionary<DelegateFactory.LateBoundPropertySet, object> propSetters) where T : Task
    {                        
        foreach (var propSet in propSetters)
        {
            propSet.Key.Invoke(propSet, propSet.Value);
        }
    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T17:23:29+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 5:23 pm

    If you are doing enough reflection that this is genuinely a bottleneck, then dynamic code may be worth investigating. Until then – maybe HyperDescriptor will reduce the cost; very similar code, but much cheaper.

    In .NET 4.0 and above, the Expression API allows you to set multiple properties, but this is only really viable if you cache the delegate. The other interesting option (with the same constraint: you must cache and re-use the delegate) is DynamicMethod. However, all of these options are fairly advanced topics. I’m happy to advise, but do you really need this?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 460k
  • Answers 460k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The strcat() function expects that the destination argument already contains… May 15, 2026 at 11:41 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The compiler complains, that you are using myGuid in a… May 15, 2026 at 11:41 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use TinyMCE http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/ It's pretty easy to use it, look… May 15, 2026 at 11:41 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.