I’m trying to parse through a table of rows using beautiful soup and save values of each row in a dict.
One hiccup is the structure of the table has some rows as the section headers. So for any row with the class ‘header’ I want to define a variable called “section”. Here’s what I have, but it’s not working because it’s saying [‘class’] TypeError: string indices must be integers
Here’s what I have:
for i in credits.contents:
if i['class'] == 'header':
section = i.contents
DATA_SET[section] = {}
else:
DATA_SET[section]['data_point_1'] = i.find('td', {'class' : 'data_point_1'}).find('p').contents
DATA_SET[section]['data_point_2'] = i.find('td', {'class' : 'data_point_2'}).find('p').contents
DATA_SET[section]['data_point_3'] = i.find('td', {'class' : 'data_point_3'}).find('p').contents
Example of data:
<table class="credits">
<tr class="header">
<th colspan="3"><h1>HEADER NAME</h1></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="data_point_1"><p>DATA</p></td>
<td class="data_point_2"><p>DATA</p></td>
<td class="data_point_3"><p>DATA</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="data_point_1"><p>DATA</p></td>
<td class="data_point_2"><p>DATA</p></td>
<td class="data_point_3"><p>DATA</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="data_point_1"><p>DATA</p></td>
<td class="data_point_2"><p>DATA</p></td>
<td class="data_point_3"><p>DATA</p></td>
</tr>
<tr class="header">
<th colspan="3"><h1>HEADER NAME</h1></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="data_point_1"><p>DATA</p></td>
<td class="data_point_2"><p>DATA</p></td>
<td class="data_point_3"><p>DATA</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="data_point_1"><p>DATA</p></td>
<td class="data_point_2"><p>DATA</p></td>
<td class="data_point_3"><p>DATA</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="data_point_1"><p>DATA</p></td>
<td class="data_point_2"><p>DATA</p></td>
<td class="data_point_3"><p>DATA</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
Here is one solution, with a slight adaptation of your example data so that the result is clearer:
Produces:
EDIT ADAPTATION OF YOUR SOLUTION
Your code is neat and has only a couple of issues. You use
contentsin places where you shoul dusetextorfindAll— I repaired that below:Please note that if successive cells have the same
data_pointclass, then successive rows will replace earlier ones. I suspect this is not an issue in your real dataset, but that is why your code would return this, abbreviated, result: