Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3221434
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T15:52:32+00:00 2026-05-17T15:52:32+00:00

I’m trying to perform a dictionary-based NER on some documents. My dictionary, regardless of

  • 0

I’m trying to perform a dictionary-based NER on some documents. My dictionary, regardless of the datatype, consists of key-value pairs of strings. I want to search for all the keys in the document, and return the corresponding value for that key whenever a match occurs.

The problem is, my dictionary is fairly large: ~7 million key-values – average length of keys: 8 and average length of values: 20 characters.

I’ve tried LingPipe with MapDictionary but on my desired environment setup, it runs out of memory after 200,000 rows are inserted. I don’t know clearly why LingPipe uses a map and not a hashmap in their algorithm.

So the thing is, I don’t have any previous experience with Lucene and I want to know if it makes such thing with such number possible in an easier way.

ps. I’ve already tried chunking the data into several dictionaries and writing them on disk but it’s relatively slow.

Thanks for any help.

Cheers
Parsa

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T15:52:33+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 3:52 pm

    I suppose if you wanted to reuse LingPipe’s ExactDictionaryChunker to do the NER, you could override their MapDictionary to store & retrieve from your choice of key/value database instead of their ObjectToSet (which does extend HashMap, by the way).

    Lucene/solr can be used as a key/value store, but if you don’t need the extra searching capabilities, just a pure look-up, other options might be better for what you’re doing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.