Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 250339
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T21:30:10+00:00 2026-05-11T21:30:10+00:00

I’m trying to provide two classes to my users – one that is read-only

  • 0

I’m trying to provide two classes to my users – one that is read-only and one that is writable. The r/o will only have getters, while the writable will inherit from it and add the setters.

I was under the impression that C# should be able to handle it, but the compiler disagreed.
Why doesn’t this work? Any workarounds?

class A
{
    protected int m_val;
    public int Val
    {
        get { return m_val; }
    }
}

class B : A
{
    public int Val
    {
        set { m_val = value; }
    }
}

class Test
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        B b = new B();
        b.Val++; // <-- WHY DOESN'T THIS WORK?!
    }
}

P.S. the protected variable in the example above is artificial. My class actually wraps some native resources and the getting/setting happens on either const or mutable native pointer.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T21:30:10+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:30 pm

    partial applies to a single type – not 2 types (A and B). You would need something more like below, ideally keeping the field private:

    class A
    {
        private int m_val;
        public int Val
        {
            get { return m_val; }
            protected set { m_val = value; }
        }
    }
    
    class B : A
    {
        public new int Val
        {
            get { return base.Val;}
            set { base.Val = value; }
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.