Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7542097
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T08:04:24+00:00 2026-05-30T08:04:24+00:00

I’m trying to read bytes from the accessory’s InputStream without blocking the thread (if

  • 0

I’m trying to read bytes from the accessory’s InputStream without blocking the thread (if possible).

Typically, I would wrap the read(buffer) call in an if available(), however available() throws an exception (even though read() works fine on the InputStream).

Are there any other solutions that would minimize thread blocking?

EDIT:

I setup AsyncTask to do the reading in the background (though I know I should use a real thread for an extended task), and it works fine-ish.

I guess the real question then is, is there any damage to performance from having a background thread constantly blocked by the ‘read’ call? There’s no effect now, but the application will become pretty intensive soon, and I’d like to at least make the communication as light-weight as possible.

Would a BufferedInputStream reduce the load at all? That has it’s own available() method.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T08:04:25+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 8:04 am

    In response to your edited question, no, there is no performance penalty from having a background thread blocked on a read() call. Basically it is as if the background thread is sleeping.

    However, if you keep spawning background threads, and you keep allowing all of them to sit blocked on read() forever, then you will have a pretty serious memory leak on your hands. It won’t degrade performance in terms of speed or anything like that, but it will eventually crash your app.

    So yes, it is important to make sure that your background threads eventually terminate (or at least to guarantee that your code isn’t going to keep trying to add new ones if the existing ones do not terminate).

    This should handle the original issue:

    public interface StreamDataHandler {
        public void handleData(byte[] buffer, int numBytes);
        public void readFailedWithError(Exception ex);
    }
    
    public class DataReader extends Thread {
        private StreamDataHandler handler;
        private InputStream input;
    
        public DataReader(InputStream in, StreamDataHandler handler) {
            super();
            this.input = in;
            this.handler = handler;
        }
    
        @Override
        public void run() {
            int numRead = 0;
            byte[] buffer = new byte[1024];
            try {
                while ((numRead = input.read(buffer)) != -1) {
                    if (this.handler != null && numRead > 0) {
                        this.handler.handleData(buffer, numRead);
                    }
                }
            }
            catch (Exception e) {
                if (this.handler != null) {
                    this.handler.readFailedWithError(e);
                }
            }
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a text area in my form which accepts all possible characters from
I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
Basically, what I'm trying to create is a page of div tags, each has
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I would like to count the length of a string with PHP. The string
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.