Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8084843
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T17:55:16+00:00 2026-06-05T17:55:16+00:00

I’m trying to setup a system to minimize complexity for people updating the site

  • 0

I’m trying to setup a system to minimize complexity for people updating the site as I will not be the main person updating daily content AND also provide clean URLs.

Since I am unable to use a DB, all of the content resides in one of two base folders (/private/content OR /private/utilities). For normal daily updates, the utilities (contains the page wrapper – header, nav, footer, etc.) folder wouldn’t need to be accessed. This minimizes the amount of visible code to the daily editor.

I’ve created an array ($allowedContent) that has the list of valid sections that are accessible. The code tests against that array to verify that the user is not attempting to access inappropriate content. With the code below, these requests would be successful. Everything else would fail.

  • http://www.example.com/
  • http://www.example.com/popup/*
  • http://www.example.com/test
  • http://www.example.com/hello
  • http://www.example.com/foobar

My question is:
Is there anything that sticks out as a problem with this approach?

.htaccess

RewriteEngine On
#  Rules
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule . index.php

PHP

// parse the URL
$requestURI = explode('/', $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']);
//print_r ($requestURI);

// a list of non-restricted dynamic content
$allowedContent = array("test", "hello", "foobar");
$allowAccess = false; // assume hackers :o

// determine the section
if (!$requestURI[1]) { // none defined - use root/home
    $section = 'home';
    $skin = true;
    $allowAccess = true;
} elseif ($requestURI[1] == 'popup') { // popup - no skin
    $section = $requestURI[2];
    $skin = false;
    $allowAccess = true;
} else {
    if (in_array($requestURI[1], $allowedContent)) { // verify that the requested content is allowed / prevent someone from trying to hack the site
        $section = $requestURI[1];
        $skin = true;
        $allowAccess = true;
    } else { // this would be either a 404 or a user trying to access a restricted directory
        echo "evil laugh"; // obviously, this would change to a 404 redirect
    }
}

Added code where content is called

// call the relevant content pieces
if ($allowAccess == true) {
    if ($skin == true ) {
        // call wrapper part 1
        include $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] . '/private/utilities/wrapperOpen.php';

        // call aside
        include $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] . '/private/utilities/header.php';

        // call aside
        include $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] . '/private/utilities/aside.php';
    }

    // call CONTENT (based on section)
    include $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] . '/private/content/' . $section . '/index.php';

    if ($skin == true ) {
        // call branding
        include $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] . '/private/utilities/branding.php';

        // call footer
        include $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] . '/private/utilities/footer.php';

        // call wrapper part 2
        include $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] . '/private/utilities/wrapperClose.php';
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T17:55:17+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 5:55 pm

    this would work.
    you coyuld also look into using xml to store data, but you need to keep watch over system memory usage and loading time if the files get too large. sosplit them up where possible.
    can’t you talk them into using a database? webhosting with database is cheap.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
Basically, what I'm trying to create is a page of div tags, each has
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I am trying to render a haml file in a javascript response like so:
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
I'm trying to use string.replace('’','') to replace the dreaded weird single-quote character: ’ (aka

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.