Question

I’m trying to store a lambda in an object system involving several layers of indirection. I’m using g++ 4.7.1.

Depending on how exactly I construct the (equivalent) objects, the lambda may or may not have the correct value.

Code:

#include <iostream>
#include <functional> // used for std::function

using namespace std; // TODO nope

typedef function<int()> intf;


struct SaveLambda {
    const intf func;
    SaveLambda(const intf& _func) : func(_func) {}  
};


struct StoreSaved {
    const SaveLambda* child;
    StoreSaved(const SaveLambda& _child) : child(&_child) {
        cout << "Before returning parent: " <<  child->func() << endl;
    }
};


int main() {
    const int ten = 10;

    auto S = SaveLambda([ten](){return ten;});
    cout << "No indirection: " << S.func() << endl << endl;

    auto saved = StoreSaved(S);
    cout << "Indirection, saved: " << saved.child->func() << endl << endl;

    auto temps = StoreSaved ( SaveLambda([ten](){cout << "&ten: "<< &ten << endl; return ten;}) );
    cout << "***** what. *****" << endl;
    cout << "Indirection, unsaved: " << temps.child->func() << endl;
    cout << "***** what. *****" << endl << endl;

    cout << "ten still lives: " << ten << endl;
}

Compile as g++ -std=c++11 -Wall -o itest itest.cpp and run: notice the one line of output with a different value.

What am I doing wrong? I assumed that capture-by-value would, well, capture by value. (Observe most disconcertingly that the print in StoreSaved (line 15) produces the correct value, unlike line 34, despite these both referring to the same object. The only difference is adding another layer of indirection.)

Answer 1

This is wrong:

auto temps = StoreSaved(
                /* This temporary value dies at the last semicolon! */
                SaveLambda([ten](){cout << "&ten: "<< &ten << endl; return ten;})
                );

StoreSaved then has a pointer to a nonexistent object. Using it is UB.