Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 679545
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T01:16:17+00:00 2026-05-14T01:16:17+00:00

I’m trying to use openmp to multithread a loop through std::set. When I write

  • 0

I’m trying to use openmp to multithread a loop through std::set. When I write the following code –

    #pragma omp parallel for
    for (std::set<A>::const_iterator i = s.begin(); i != s.end(); ++i) {
            const A a = *i;
            operate(a);
    }

I get this error:

error: invalid type for iteration variable 'i'
error: invalid controlling predicate
error: invalid increment expression.

Is there an another, correct way to iterate through std containers using openmp?
I know I can use int i and iterate from 0 to s.size() and an iterator or operator[] in the loop body, but this looks much less clean.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T01:16:18+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 1:16 am

    Loop parallelization for stl iterators only works since OpenMP 3.0, and only for random access iterators (e.g. vector and deque). You should be able to do something like this:

    #pragma omp parallel {
       for (std::set<A>::const_iterator i = s.begin(); i != s.end(); ++i) {
          #pragma omp single nowait {
             operate(*i);
          }
       }
    }
    

    Overhead is quite big though because each thread iterates over the whole sequence (but only executes operate on some of it). Your method using an int i is more efficient.

    As an alternative take a look at GCC’s parallel implementation of std::for_each. See my comment.

    EDIT: The STL Parallism TS, which will most likely be part of C++17, might be a good option in the future for iterating over standard containers.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 411k
  • Answers 411k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use find, e.g. % DIR=/foo/bar/blech % SUFFIX=txt %… May 15, 2026 at 7:48 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer what about using a custom selector $(document).ready(function(){ $.extend($.expr[':'], { notext:… May 15, 2026 at 7:48 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Xcode 4 supports git natively (Developer Tools State of the… May 15, 2026 at 7:48 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.