Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 509453
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T07:00:44+00:00 2026-05-13T07:00:44+00:00

I’m trying to use partial template specialization on a (non-member) function, and I’m tripping

  • 0

I’m trying to use partial template specialization on a (non-member) function, and I’m tripping up on the syntax. I’ve searched StackOverflow for other partial template specialization questions, but those deal with partial specialization of a class or member function template.

For a starting point, I have:

struct RGBA {
    RGBA(uint8 red, uint8 green, uint8 blue, uint8 alpha = 255) :
        r(red), g(green), b(blue), a(alpha)
    {}

    uint8 r, g, b, a;
};

struct Grayscale {
    Grayscale(uint8 intensity) : value(intensity) {}

    uint8 value;
};

inline uint8 IntensityFromRGB(uint8 r, uint8 g, uint8 b) {
    return static_cast<uint8>(0.30*r + 0.59*g + 0.11*b);
}

// Generic pixel conversion.  Must specialize this template for specific
// conversions.
template <typename InType, typename OutType>
OutType ConvertPixel(InType source);

I can do a complete specialization of ConvertPixel to make an RGBA to Grayscale conversion function like this:

template <>
Grayscale ConvertPixel<RGBA, Grayscale>(RGBA source) {
    return Grayscale(IntensityFromRGB(source.r, source.g, source.b));
}

I’ll conceivably have more pixel types that offer red, green, and blue, but perhaps in a different format, so what I’d really like to do is a partial specialization by specifying Grayscale for OutType and still allow for a variety of InTypes. I’ve tried a variety of approaches like this:

template <typename InType>
Grayscale ConvertPixel<InType, Grayscale>(InType source) {
    return Grayscale(IntensityFromRGB(source.r, source.g, source.b));
}

But the (Microsoft VS 2008 C++) compiler rejects it.

Is what I’m attempting possible? If so, what’s the right syntax?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T07:00:45+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:00 am

    It is possible using class partitial specialization:

    template<class A, class B>
    struct Functor {
        static A convert(B source);
    };
    
    template<class B>
    struct Functor<GrayScale, B> {
        static GrayScale convert(B source) {
             return Grayscale(IntensityFromRGB(source.r, source.g, source.b));
        }
    };
    
    // Common function
    template<class A, class B>
    A Convert(B source) {
       return typename Functor<A,B>::convert(source);
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.