Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 596215
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T16:08:52+00:00 2026-05-13T16:08:52+00:00

I’m trying to write a program to display PCM data. I’ve been very frustrated

  • 0

I’m trying to write a program to display PCM data. I’ve been very frustrated trying to find a library with the right level of abstraction, but I’ve found the python wave library and have been using that. However, I’m not sure how to interpret the data.

The wave.getparams function returns (2 channels, 2 bytes, 44100 Hz, 96333 frames, No compression, No compression). This all seems cheery, but then I tried printing a single frame:’\xc0\xff\xd0\xff’ which is 4 bytes. I suppose it’s possible that a frame is 2 samples, but the ambiguities do not end there.

96333 frames * 2 samples/frame * (1/44.1k sec/sample) = 4.3688 seconds

However, iTunes reports the time as closer to 2 seconds and calculations based on file size and bitrate are in the ballpark of 2.7 seconds. What’s going on here?

Additionally, how am I to know if the bytes are signed or unsigned?

Many thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T16:08:52+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 4:08 pm

    “Two channels” means stereo, so it makes no sense to sum each channel’s duration — so you’re off by a factor of two (2.18 seconds, not 4.37). As for signedness, as explained for example here, and I quote:

    8-bit samples are stored as unsigned
    bytes, ranging from 0 to 255. 16-bit
    samples are stored as 2’s-complement
    signed integers, ranging from -32768
    to 32767.

    This is part of the specs of the WAV format (actually of its superset RIFF) and thus not dependent on what library you’re using to deal with a WAV file.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.