Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 965127
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T01:56:39+00:00 2026-05-16T01:56:39+00:00

I’m trying to write unit tests for an application that reports on Entries in

  • 0

I’m trying to write unit tests for an application that reports on Entries in an EventLog. Right now when I run the unit tests, I’m having to create a temporary EventLog, write entries to it, and delete the log when I’m done. I’m doing this because I need to get back the EventLogEntry object, which have no constructor.

My question is are there any ways of mocking an EventLog to be able to get back EventLogEntries. Having to write entries to the actual EventLog seems more like integration testing than unit testing to me.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T01:56:39+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 1:56 am

    You would be correct that this is more of an integration test. However you need to ask yourself what you are really trying to test here. If it is truly a unit test, and you only want to test the logic over your EventLogEntries, then you should treat the event log like any other external dependency.

    TDD has lead me down the road of isolating and mocking many things that feel strange to mock, but have ended up saving me from maintenance nightmares later on. i.e. File IO, Logging, Tracing, etc…

    I would stick all your CRUD operations to the event log behind an interface boundary and treat it as if it were data access. If you can’t easily create EventLogEntries out of band, then you might even consider creating your own entities that represent entries from the event log and use them.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.